To find out more about this framework, read the article “A leaders framework for decision making” and/or contact Steople to seek our support in understanding what this means for you and your VUCA world.
https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making
A fantastic article titled The Future of Work: You Might Be Thinking About the Future of Work All Wrong, published in HRM (Australia) recently caught my eye. It offers thought-provoking insights that are definitely worth reading. I find myself in agreement with many of its key points, which I’ll summarise below. Additionally, I’d like to share some of our own research and offer my personal perspective, particularly given our hands-on experience working in this space at Steople.
One of the first key messages in the article is that total jobs will not be lost, leading to mass unemployment, however there will be mass redeployment because tasks will be automated rather than entire jobs lost. A 2023 McKinsey report estimates that half of today’s work activities could become automated between 2030 and 2060. To cope with these changes, we need to spend time and money learning transferable skills and capabilities to enable us the flexibility to adapt to the future of work.
A related point is that employees will need a plan for their career path and employers will need to proactively provide more opportunities. This is not necessarily about climbing the ladder and will more often be about horizontal opportunities where they can develop skills. A review of more recent research has shown that the top skills needed for future jobs (many of which do not exist today) will include: creativity and innovation; analytical thinking and complex judgement; technology design; emotional intelligence; empathy and listening; and leadership and influence. Organisations will need to invest in learning and development programs in the coming years that deliberately and specifically build these types of capabilities.
Since the pandemic, there have been increased incidences of isolation, loneliness and burnout (amongst other mental health and wellbeing issues). The HRM article states that for every dollar spent on wellbeing by organisations, there is a $2.40 return on the bottom line. At Steople, we’ve seen a massive increase in the demand for our wellbeing services over the last 18 months. Whilst we have been offering various preventative wellbeing services for over 10 years now, the demand for this service has sky-rocketed globally. The best employers are listening to their employees and are investing in helping them to cope with health and wellbeing issues. Some of them are doing this just because it is the right thing to do. Others also know that they will receive a significant return on investment over the long-term.
In 2019, Dr Sean Gallagher from Swinburne Centre for New Workforces argued that “the more digital our workplaces become, the more human we need to be”. Building on this theme, Nemat Shafik, Director of London School of Economics and Political Science, in 2018, stated that “in the past jobs were about muscles, now they’re about brains, but in the future, they’ll be about the heart”. Both of these comments, from extremely well-respected individuals, strongly suggest that the future of work will be (or at least will need to be) more human. Since these comments were made, we’ve all experienced the changes associated with the rise of artificial intelligence and automation. This only increases the need for more human connectedness, however it is likely to be in different ways to the past. Prior to the global pandemic, we had a lot more incidental and unplanned conversations with people and social interactions just happened. Now, with the increase in remote work, Zoom and virtual work environments, we must be more intentional about how, when, and where we connect. It’s important to proactively schedule time for casual interactions, non-work-related discussions, and social engagement to maintain meaningful connections.
In relation to leadership, Dr Brene Brown, a research professor at the University of Houston who has attained a cult-like following over recent years for her work in the area of vulnerability, argued that we need to create more human leaders. To do this we need to be courageous. It requires leaders who are willing to take risks, embrace their vulnerabilities and show up as imperfect, real people. I agree with Brene Brown and add that this is exactly the type of leadership that we need now, and in the future, to create great work cultures and effective workforces in the future. No longer can we separate out work from home. On Zoom or Teams calls we can now see into people’s homes. We can see their rooms, their cats and dogs, their children….and I like this new norm. We get to see real people. This is already becoming more crucial to work cultures across the planet and will only increase in the future.
Read the full HRM Article here
If you would like to find out more, contact your local Steople office today here.
Every day, divisive topics dominate our headlines and conversations, leaving us more polarised than ever. Whether it’s politics, workplace challenges, or societal debates, it can feel almost impossible to bridge the gap between differing views. But what if there was a way to reconnect and find common ground? Charles Duhigg’s book, Supercommunicators: How to Unlock the Secret Language of Connection, offers a powerful framework to do just that—one conversation at a time.
The world is becoming increasingly entrenched in opposing viewpoints. People are often quick to dismiss or misunderstand others’ perspectives. This lack of constructive dialogue isn’t just a societal problem—it’s also a challenge in workplaces, families, and communities. What would it take to truly understand each other? Duhigg’s insights on having better conversations struck a chord with me, particularly his concept of “looping for understanding.”
Consider the contentious issue of gun violence in the United States. The statistics are staggering: in 2023, over 42,000 people died from gun injuries, and for every person killed, two more were seriously injured. The financial cost of gun violence was more than $557 billion in 2022. Despite widespread acknowledgment of the problem, solutions remain elusive due to deeply entrenched beliefs and political divides.
For example, the Second Amendment protects the private right to bear arms, but its interpretation has been fiercely debated in landmark cases like District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010). While 58% of Americans favour stricter gun laws, political and cultural differences make meaningful change challenging.
In contrast, Australia’s approach to gun laws offers a striking comparison. Following the Port Arthur massacre in 1996, Australia enacted sweeping reforms, leading to significant reductions in gun deaths. While Australians often view the US gun debate as perplexing, it’s essential to understand the deeply personal stories and values that underpin these perspectives.
Duhigg’s “looping for understanding” framework offers a pathway to navigate such contentious issues—whether in society or within our own teams and relationships. The goal isn’t to win an argument but to build trust and understanding. The framework involves three simple steps:
The ultimate aim is to ensure the other person feels genuinely heard and understood. Neuroscience shows that this kind of dialogue can create “neural entrainment,” where brain activity aligns between participants, fostering trust and connection.
In Duhigg’s book, he shares a compelling example of a pro-gun rights advocate. Through open-ended questions, listeners discovered her fear of being powerless – rooted in a traumatic experience where a relative was assaulted in her home. She explained, “That gun is my peace of mind. When people say they want to take it away, what they’re saying is they want me to feel powerless again.”
A participant summarised: “You see your gun as a symbol that you won’t let anyone hurt you. Did I get that right?” She responded, “It’s proof that I deserve to feel safe, and I belong here as much as anyone else.”
This conversation didn’t erase differences but created a foundation of trust, allowing participants to find areas of agreement and potential solutions.
In workplaces, polarised views often arise around changes, performance expectations, or team dynamics. Leaders can use the “looping for understanding” framework to foster psychological safety and trust within their teams. By prioritising understanding over control, leaders can uncover the values and experiences driving their team members’ perspectives, enabling more constructive collaboration.
For example, during a difficult performance review, instead of focusing solely on outcomes, a leader might ask:
These steps demonstrate respect and a willingness to listen, paving the way for meaningful dialogue and shared solutions.
Well-known researcher Sheila Heen reminds us that everyone has a story that shapes their beliefs. Understanding these stories doesn’t mean abandoning our own values – it’s about building a bridge. As Duhigg highlights, when we genuinely understand the emotions and experiences behind someone’s perspective, we can begin to address the real issues at hand.
The next time you encounter a polarised discussion – whether it’s in the boardroom, at home, or online – pause and try Duhigg’s approach. Start with curiosity. Ask questions. Listen deeply. Summarise what you’ve heard. Prove to the other person that you’ve truly understood their story. You might not resolve the issue overnight, but you’ll take a vital step toward connection and trust.
Let’s commit to having better conversations. Together, we can bridge divides and create a more empathetic, collaborative world – one dialogue at a time.
If you would like to find out more, contact your local Steople office today here.